It is no secret that we live in an age of distractions and short attention spans. “Doomscrolling,” the word for finding yourself sucked into social media for much longer than you ever intended to be, is a household word at this point that just about every single person has experienced. In all fairness, most of these distractions, social media or otherwise, are literally designed to keep your attention. You are motivated to keep going through those little dopamine rushes that most of us are also becoming aware about. However, we certainly have motivations to not get distracted, especially since most of us are in a college environment. We have grades to think about, and a limited amount of time in our days most of us would rather spend with friends. How often do distractions actually win out, and how much are we enabling these distractions?
Procrastination
In my personal experience, I find myself most vulnerable to digital distractions as a form of procrastination. If there is something I do not want to do, then I am more likely to spend more time on my phone or more likely to pull up a sudoku puzzle on my computer instead of reading the Walden text that was on my screen before. This only gets worse if it is an assignment that I feel like I am going to have a particularly hard time on. I am going to dread the extra amount of work, but I do know that I still have to start it at some point. This is where I give myself the digital distractions that I do agree to attend to. They are the limited distractions that have a time limit. I will only do the amount of sudoku puzzles that are available in the New York Times. I will only scroll on Social Media until my screentime count kicks in. Are these time consuming and distracting? Absolutely! But they are distractions that I am actively allowing myself, as I do enjoy them and because I have the belief that they will end. I am living my life under the dictates of the distractions I allow myself. Unfortunately, the one that gets out of hand is the screentime one. It is where I fall victim to a trap that a phone has set for me. See, when you set an app to only give you an allotted amount of screen time every day, and that time runs out, the phone does not immediately kick you out of the app. Instead, it gives you four options. Only one of the options will shut the app. The other three options allow you to extend your screentime, as well as to shut off the screen time limit for the app for the rest of your. All it takes is a simple thoughtless tap. Now, yes, when I am making the choice to extend these times when I tap “fifteen more minutes,” which I especially do when dealing with a particularly threatening assignment on the horizon and want to reset that timer. However, this choice is made under deliberate pressure of someone who designed this option, who most likely did so with the intention of making it easier to override. People who have screentime limit most likely due so because they have trouble self-regulating, so making the option to override is able to be done so thoughtlessly makes it feel like an intentional trap. A more concerned part would have made override more difficult, like having to go directly to “Settings” to override it, so a user would be forced to give themselves a moment to think about what they are doing and possibly change their mind. The current design is deliberate pressure intended to keep me distracted.
What makes an assignment seem intimidating or easy to get distracted on?
Now, I tend to allow myself distractions on certain assignments more than others, which is interesting. I had a heap of assignments, both intimidating and not, last week, so it was pretty easy to analyze why that is. The assignments that are always the least intimidating are usually the reading directly from the modules in this very class, English 340, such as the IIIF Images module from last week. These are the assignments that I never had trouble starting or finishing. I think this is because they were usually pretty short, so it was easy to hype myself up and get them done. More than that, they usually came along with instructions to follow on VHS Code as you read, so they kept one engaged Another assignment that I do not get distracted during is reading out of a physical book, particularly a novel. I am attempting to read the novel Muck for my Bible as Literature class without getting much of a schedule, but I am reading two chapters a day without any distractions. This is because I enjoy reading, and because it actively takes me away from any screens that may want to take my attention away. The assignments that are intimidating and that I find myself getting distracted by are two particularly difficult reads that happened to be on my schedule last week, and pretty regularly. This is Walden and the Bible. They are intimidating because they do not keep my attention. They are rambling and repetitive, and though I can see the beauty of their ideas, I know it is going to take more focus and effort to read them than I am occasionally willing to give. It is being bored in an assignment that makes me open to distraction in this case, but I would say that getting distracted during these texts is certainly more something I agree to do than hesitating to start them, even though both are common. The absolute worst offender of intimidating assignments are newspaper articles. I am member of the Lamron, which usually means I am writing at least an article weekly. Last week, I took two articles, one of which was in the News. You need a lot of sources to write for News, and rightfully so, but that means these articles come with a lot of research. That makes it daunting to start, and when you actually start writing, it is so easy to get distracted by the random questions that pop into your head when your cursor is already at the search bar.
Distracted from Distractions
Here is a fun little corner I ended up backing myself into last weekend. Feeling burnt out from both social media and my workload, I made myself a little deal. I would start my homework after I finished a drawing I had been wanting to make (“It is not procrastination if it is productive!” What a beautiful lie we love to tell ourselves as we clean our dorms to avoid that essay). Now, that is not a “digital distraction,” but it was certainly one that I agreed to attend to. At least, for the most part I agreed. In an ideal world, I would have sat down, finished my drawing in a timely manner, and moved right along to my homework feeling refreshed and rejuvenated. Unfortunately, I encountered a problem because of the fact that I usually use reference photos while I draw, so my phone was right next to me and I was glancing at it quite a lot. This made it easy to distract myself in the same way I could while researching for an article. I am already on Google, so what’s the harm in typing in that one random question that popped into your head, and accidentally falling down that rabbithole of link after link that has nothing to do with the task at hand.
In conclusion, it seems like knowing these distractions are available makes it harder to ignore them. If your screentime reminder is giving you the option to ignore it with just a tap, of course it is easy to say “fifteen more minutes”. If you are already doing something on your computer, and your not having a great time, you start to notice it would be so easy to switch tabs to a little mindless game online, and voila, you are stuck. A lot of it comes down to self-discipline, but we are also living in a world where phones and computers want you to waste time. It gives them money, so of course they are going to make it easy. We are living our lives under the pressure of these distractions, and we have to make an effort to be conscious of where we are putting our attention.

